Nagkaisa Strongly Condemn Alliance Verdict: Is Defending Truth a Crime?

The High Court today found former Hong Kong Alliance chair Lee Cheuk-yan and former vice-chair Chow Hang-tung guilty of “inciting others to subvert state power”. The case has been adjourned until Friday (28 August) for mitigation. We strongly condemn the verdict and are deeply concerned that the case further demonstrates how Hong Kong’s National Security Law is being used to erode long-standing freedoms of expression and association, and to narrow the space for peaceful political advocacy. 

Christopher Mung, Executive Director of Hong Kong Labour Rights Monitor, said: 

“Today’s verdict is not simply a conviction of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung. It is also a blatant conviction of conscience and truth. For more than three decades, the Hong Kong Alliance promoted democratic ideals through peaceful and non-violent means. To now characterise such advocacy as incitement to subvert state power sends a deeply disturbing message to the world: that there is no longer room in Hong Kong for peaceful dissent or political expression.” 

At the heart of the case was not whether the defendants had planned violence, a coup or any unlawful attempt to seize power. The prosecution instead focused on one of the Alliance’s five long-standing objectives: “ending one-party dictatorship”. It argued that, as chair and vice-chair of the Alliance, Lee and Chow were necessarily involved in efforts to subvert state power through unconstitutional and unlawful means. 

Yet the prosecution failed to identify any specific unlawful means that Lee or Chow had advocated, or to establish that either defendant had planned or incited violence. Much of the case centred on statements they had made publicly. This verdict therefore clearly amounts to criminalising people for what they say, dealing another severe blow to Hong Kong’s already threatened freedom of expression. Giving evidence in court, Lee recalled how Beijing residents helped him escape Tiananmen Square 37 years ago, enabling him to leave safely. He told the court that seeking justice for the victims of the Tiananmen crackdown and building a democratic China had become his lifelong commitment. “There is no hatred in my heart, only love for the people,” he said. 

Chow described the annual June 4 candlelight vigil in Victoria Park as an expression of “love and responsibility”, rather than hatred. Both defendants repeatedly stressed that the Alliance advocated constitutional reform, democratic institutions, the rule of law and checks and balances on power, but not the violent overthrow of the government. 

For more than three decades, the Alliance organised the annual June 4 candlelight vigil in Victoria Park peacefully, calling for accountability for the Tiananmen crackdown and keeping alive the aspirations of its victims for democratic reform. For many years, Hong Kong was the only place in China where the events of June 4 could be openly commemorated and discussed. 

Hong Kong once allowed people to commemorate June 4 publicly, debate political systems and advocate for political reform. Today, forms of peaceful public expression that were once part of Hong Kong’s civic life can instead be treated as matters of national security. 

This verdict is therefore about more than the Hong Kong Alliance. It is a further example of the criminalisation of civil society in Hong Kong and the shrinking space for peaceful political and civic participation. 

History must not become a forbidden subject, and peaceful political advocacy must not be treated as a crime. 

We urge the Hong Kong authorities to respect the fundamental rights protected under the Basic Law and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to stop using national security offences to suppress peaceful political expression, and to ensure that people can express their views, participate in public debate and advocate peacefully for reform without fear of criminal prosecution. 

We also call on the international community to continue monitoring the human rights and rule of law situation in Hong Kong, and to maintain close scrutiny of this case and others involving people who have peacefully exercised their fundamental rights.

NAGKAISA! STANDS WITH SENTRO AND DUWU: RESPECT WORKERS’ RIGHTS, END UNION-BUSTING

MANILA — NAGKAISA! Labor Coalition and its affiliate labor organizations stand in full solidarity with SENTRO and its local union, the DHL United Workers Union (DUWU), as DUWU workers continue their strike in pursuit of good-faith negotiations, fair compensation, wage increases, respect for freedom of association, and a meaningful Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA).

On Friday, 21 August 2026 at 10:00 AM, NAGKAISA! and allied workers’ organizations will hold a second wave of nationwide solidarity actions at DHL outlets across the regions, including a solidarity presence at the DUWU strike site in Muntinlupa City.

“This is not simply a dispute between a company and its workers. This is a test of whether workers’ basic rights to organize, bargain collectively, and demand fair treatment will be respected,” said Atty. Sonny G. Matula, Chairperson of NAGKAISA!

“We urge DHL: huwag labagin ang karapatan ng mga manggagawa na mag-unyon. Ang freedom of association ay hindi pribilehiyo ng management kundi batayang karapatan na dapat igalang at protektahan ng DHL.

“Kung tunay na global company ang DHL, dapat global din ang respeto nito sa workers’ rights. Itigil ang union-busting. Kilalanin ang unyon at makipag-bargain in good faith,” Matula added.

For DUWU, the issue is straightforward: workers are demanding respect for their rights and a genuine process for resolving their concerns.

“DUWU workers are not asking for special treatment. We are asking DHL to respect our rights as workers and as a legitimate union. We are ready to negotiate. What we need from management is good faith, respect, and a genuine commitment to reach a fair CBA,” said Nap Aromin, DUWU Union President.

SENTRO likewise emphasized that the right to organize and bargain collectively must be protected in practice, not merely recognized in principle.

“SENTRO stands firmly with DUWU. The right to organize and bargain collectively cannot be respected only when it is convenient for management. We call on DHL to engage the union sincerely, address the workers’ legitimate demands, and end actions that undermine their freedom of association,” said Nice Coronacion, SENTRO Deputy Secretary-General.

NAGKAISA! calls on DHL management to respect the workers’ right to organize, end union-busting, recognize the legitimate role of DUWU, and return to the negotiating table in good faith. A company operating across borders must also uphold universal labor rights wherever it operates.

The nationwide solidarity actions demonstrate that DUWU workers are not alone. NAGKAISA!, SENTRO, and allied labor organizations will continue to stand with workers defending their fundamental rights to organize, bargain collectively, and secure decent and fair working conditions.

Workers’ rights are not negotiable. Respect the union. Stop union-busting. Negotiate the CBA now.

NAGKAISA! TO SUPREME COURT: ACT WITH URGENCY ON ₱85 WAGE CASE

“Defend the ₱85, advance the ₱200 national wage hike”

MANILA — NAGKAISA! labor alliances and networks today filed a Manifestation before the Supreme Court, formally informing the High Court of the Writ of Preliminary Injunction issued by Pasig RTC Branch 152 that continues to restrain the implementation of NCR Wage Order No. 27 and its ₱85 wage adjustment.

For NAGKAISA!, the injunction makes urgent Supreme Court action even more necessary. Workers cannot be made to fight for the same Wage Order courtroom by courtroom, RTC by RTC, while their wage increase remains out of reach.

“Workers have waited long enough. Every day the wage increase remains restrained is another day that money for food, pamasahe, kuryente, gamot and other necessities does not reach the worker,” said Atty. Sonny Matula, NAGKAISA! Chairperson.

The first tranche of the ₱85 adjustment is ₱60 on the previous ₱695 NCR minimum wage. While modest, NAGKAISA! stressed that it is real and immediate relief for minimum-wage workers.

“Hindi ito wage na malaking putok ng bulkang Mayon. Maliit siguro sa spreadsheet, pero hindi maliit kapag nasa palengke ka na.”

NAGKAISA! said the case raises a fundamental question requiring an authoritative answer from the Supreme Court: How far may regular courts intervene in a wage-setting process specifically established by labor law?

“Huwag gawing bola ang ₱60. Workers should not be benched while their wage increase is passed from one courtroom to another. Pasig today, Navotas tomorrow—where does it end? One Wage Order deserves one clear and authoritative answer from the Supreme Court,” Matula said.

The coalition emphasized that its campaign has two interconnected fronts: defend the immediate ₱85 NCR wage adjustment and advance a ₱200 nationally legislated wage increase.

“We defend the ₱85 because workers need relief today. But ₱85 is not the finish line. The bigger fight is for a meaningful ₱200 national legislated wage increase and genuine reform of our wage-setting system,” said NAGKAISA! Spokesperson Ka Rene Magtubo.

“We cannot build an economy on poverty wages. Workers are producers, but they are consumers too. Put additional wages in a worker’s pocket and that money goes to the palengke, carinderia, jeepney, pharmacy and sari-sari store. Increasing workers’ purchasing power also helps move the economy,” Magtubo added.

NAGKAISA! Convenor Josua Mata emphasized that the coalition is asking the Supreme Court for prompt judicial action.

“Why should workers have to fight this hard just to receive a wage increase that the wage-setting system has already granted? This is a call for urgency, not interference. We respect the Court and its processes. But workers’ bills do not observe judicial calendars. Rice, rent and electricity do not file motions for extension.”

For NAGKAISA!, the issue goes beyond ₱60 or ₱85. It concerns who the law entrusts to fix wages, who reviews those decisions, and when regular courts may stop their implementation.

NAGKAISA! will continue mobilizing its federations, unions, alliances and networks to defend Wage Order No. 27, while pressing Congress and the administration to pursue a ₱200 national legislated wage increase and comprehensive wage-system reform.

NAGKAISA!’S CALL

DEFEND THE ₱85.

SUPREME COURT: ACT WITH URGENCY.

₱200 NATIONAL LEGISLATED WAGE INCREASE — NEXT.

REFORM THE WAGE SYSTEM.

NAGKAISA: Mr. Secretary, The Country Has Spoken. It Is Time for DOLE to Lead

A broad national consensus has emerged: the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) suspending the NCR wage increase must be lifted.

The Office of the Solicitor General has asked the court to lift the TRO. Malacañang has publicly supported its immediate lifting. Twenty-one senators have done the same. The labor movement stands united in defending the lawful wage increase.

The question now is no longer whether the TRO should be lifted. The question is whether Labor Secretary Francis Tolentino will personally lead the fight to lift it.

This is DOLE’s wage order. It is DOLE’s responsibility to defend it—not only in court but also in the court of public opinion.

NAGKAISA challenges Secretary Tolentino to answer the questions that matter to millions of Filipino workers:

Will he personally lead the fight to lift the TRO issued by the Pasig Regional Trial Court?

How does he intend to prevent more employers from filing copycat petitions to stop future wage increases?

What concrete measures will DOLE pursue to plug the legal loopholes now being exploited to deny workers even the measly wage increases granted by the Regional Wage Boards?

And when will DOLE finally acknowledge that the regional wage-fixing system is broken and abandon its hold on this failed mechanism in favor of genuine wage reform?

“The President has spoken. The government’s chief lawyer has acted. The Senate has taken a stand. Workers have united. Mr. Secretary, this is your moment to lead. Defend the wage order your Department issued, close the loopholes that allow employers to frustrate lawful wage increases, and stop treating every wage order as an invitation for endless litigation.”

NAGKAISA reiterates its calls to immediately lift the TRO issued by the Pasig Regional Trial Court, dismiss the petition pending before the Navotas Regional Trial Court, enact a legislated ₱200 across-the-board wage increase, and replace the failed regional wage-fixing system with a national wage-setting mechanism that delivers timely, meaningful, and enforceable wage increases for all workers.

Workers have waited long enough. Justice delayed is justice denied.